ETF Updates: HBAR and DOGE's Path to Approval You Need to Know
Understanding the SEC's Regulatory Process for Altcoin ETFs
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Recently, the SEC has delayed decisions on several altcoin ETFs, including those for HBAR and DOGE, citing the need for further review and public feedback. This regulatory process involves multiple stages, such as the submission of S-1 and 19b-4 forms, public comment periods, and comprehensive evaluations of market risks like manipulation and liquidity.
What Is the SEC's Role in ETF Approvals?
The SEC's primary responsibility is to ensure that ETFs meet stringent regulatory standards. For altcoin ETFs, this includes assessing:
Market Manipulation Risks: Ensuring the ETF is not vulnerable to price manipulation.
Liquidity Concerns: Evaluating whether the underlying asset has sufficient liquidity to support an ETF.
Investor Protection: Safeguarding retail and institutional investors from undue risks.
Public Comment Periods and Their Role in ETF Approvals
Public comment periods are a critical component of the SEC's decision-making process. These periods allow stakeholders, including investors, industry experts, and advocacy groups, to provide feedback on proposed ETFs. For altcoins like HBAR and DOGE, public sentiment and institutional interest could significantly influence the SEC's final decision.
Why Public Feedback Matters
Public feedback helps the SEC gauge:
Market Demand: Understanding the appetite for altcoin ETFs.
Institutional Support: Assessing whether institutional players are backing the ETF.
Potential Risks: Identifying concerns raised by the public and industry experts.
HBAR's Unique Position in the ETF Landscape
HBAR's Classification as a Non-Security
One of HBAR's key advantages in the ETF approval process is its classification as a non-security by the SEC. This distinction could expedite its approval compared to other altcoins that face stricter regulatory scrutiny. Analysts believe this classification positions HBAR favorably in the growing market for regulated crypto investment products.
Existing HBAR ETPs in European Markets
While HBAR's ETF journey in the U.S. is still unfolding, it has already made significant strides in Europe. HBAR-based exchange-traded products (ETPs) are currently trading on platforms like Börse Frankfurt and Euronext Amsterdam. These listings demonstrate institutional interest and provide a glimpse into the potential market impact of an HBAR ETF in the U.S.
DOGE's ETF Application and Regulatory Pathway
DOGE and the Section 8(a) Automatic-Approval Rule
DOGE's ETF application, submitted by Bitwise, is taking a unique regulatory pathway under the Section 8(a) automatic-approval rule. This rule allows an ETF to launch within 20 days unless the SEC intervenes. While this pathway offers a faster route to market, it also comes with challenges, including heightened scrutiny over market manipulation and liquidity.
Market Response to DOGE's ETF News
DOGE's price action has been notably volatile, influenced by whale distribution and ETF-driven sentiment. While technical indicators show mixed signals, the growing institutional interest in DOGE ETFs highlights its potential as a mainstream investment vehicle.
Institutional Adoption and the Future of Altcoin ETFs
Growing Institutional Interest
Institutional interest in altcoin ETFs is on the rise. Analysts predict a 90% chance of approval for several altcoin ETFs, including HBAR and DOGE, by 2025. This growing demand reflects a broader trend toward regulated crypto investment products, which offer a safer and more accessible entry point for traditional investors.
Challenges: Market Manipulation and Liquidity
Despite the optimism, market manipulation and liquidity challenges remain significant hurdles for altcoin ETFs. Smaller or less mature markets, such as those for DOGE and HBAR, are particularly vulnerable to these risks. Addressing these issues will be crucial for gaining regulatory approval and ensuring market stability.
Comparing Altcoin ETFs to Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs
Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have set a precedent for crypto investment products, but altcoin ETFs like those for HBAR and DOGE face unique challenges. Unlike Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have established liquidity and market maturity, altcoins must overcome additional scrutiny related to their smaller market caps and higher volatility.
Key Differences Between Altcoin and Bitcoin/Ethereum ETFs
Liquidity: Bitcoin and Ethereum have deeper liquidity pools compared to altcoins.
Market Maturity: Altcoins are generally less mature, leading to higher volatility.
Regulatory Scrutiny: Altcoins face stricter evaluations due to their smaller market caps.
Predictions for Altcoin ETF Approvals in 2025
Analysts are optimistic about the future of altcoin ETFs, with many predicting a wave of approvals by 2025. This optimism is fueled by:
Increasing Institutional Interest: More traditional investors are exploring altcoin ETFs.
Advancements in Regulatory Frameworks: The SEC is gradually refining its approach to crypto ETFs.
Growing Adoption of Cryptocurrencies: Altcoins are becoming mainstream investment assets.
However, the timeline for approval will largely depend on how effectively the industry addresses concerns around market manipulation and liquidity.
Conclusion
The journey toward ETF approval for altcoins like HBAR and DOGE is a complex and evolving process. While regulatory hurdles remain, the growing institutional interest and unique advantages of these altcoins position them as strong contenders in the crypto ETF market. As the SEC continues to evaluate proposals and gather public feedback, the future of altcoin ETFs looks increasingly promising, offering new opportunities for both retail and institutional investors.
© 2025 OKX TR. This article may be reproduced or distributed in its entirety, or excerpts of 100 words or less of this article may be used, provided such use is non-commercial. Any reproduction or distribution of the entire article must also prominently state:"This article is © 2025 OKX TR and is used with permission." Permitted excerpts must cite to the name of the article and include attribution, for example "Article Name, [author name if applicable], © 2025 OKX TR." Some content may be generated or assisted by artificial intelligence (AI) tools. No derivative works or other uses of this article are permitted.




