Retarded World Assets price

Today in Abstract Memecoins: (Brought to you by $BROCK) ✳️ Overall it's a green day on the green chain ✳️ Tier-1 memecoins ($5m+) are all up single digits with king PENGU leading the charge at 7% ✳️ Tier-2 ($1m - $5m) are also up. $RWA showed a healthy 16% gain on the day ✳️ In Tier-3 (sub $1m), $GOONER and $DPENGU are the standouts. GOONER, up 35%, is inching toward tier-2 territory

Doubled the number of RWA holders again in less than 24 hours Goons are in control

By Frank, PANews In the past month, the veteran public chain Injective has returned to the public eye again with the second place in net inflows. According to Artemis data, Injective's net inflow in the past 30 days is about $142 million, which is only lower than Ethereum. PANews also looked at other aspects of Injective's data and found that this net inflow was not a singular phenomenon. There has been a significant increase in on-chain fees, active users, token trading volume, etc. After a long period of silence, will Injective, the former rising star of the public chain, usher in an ecological explosion again? Or was it a short-lived flash in the pan? With a monthly inflow of $142 million, is the high yield a "honey" or a "signal flare"? Data as of June 4 shows that Injective has achieved a net inflow of $142 million in the past month. Although the amount is not high, it still ranks second in the recent data of all public chains. A closer look at the data shows that the obvious reason for this net inflow is that Injective did indeed see a wave of rapid and large inflows on the one hand, and a very small net outflow of $11 million on the other. Therefore, if we look into the reasons for this, Injective's top net inflow ranking is not due to its unusually active overall capital flows (i.e., large inflows and outflows at the same time). In fact, its simple capital inflow only ranks about 10th in the horizontal comparison with other public chains. The key to its outstanding performance in the 'net inflow' indicator is that the outflow of funds over the same period is negligible. However, this kind of on-chain fund movement is also rare for the Injective network. Of the 142 million inflows, 140 million were completed through the Peggy cross-chain bridge, accounting for 98.5% of the share. Market analyst Keyrock pointed out in its May 26 report, "Key Insights, Bond Appetit," that the massive inflow was largely attributed to the launch of Upshift, an institutional-grade yield platform, on Injective. It is understood that Upshift's APY in Injective's vault has reached 30%, and this high yield may indeed be an important reason to attract funds to transfer assets to Injective. However, PANews found through investigation that Upshift's vault hard cap of $5 million in Infinite cannot fully handle the inflow of funds, and those funds that fail to participate in this vault investment may be lost again in the short term. From derivatives to RWA hopes, can Injective open up a new game? In addition to the inflow of funds, Injective has indeed ushered in some important changes in the ecosystem recently. On April 22, the Lyora mainnet was officially launched, and this upgrade is an important milestone in Injective's development history. After this mainnet upgrade, technical optimizations such as dynamic fee structure and smart memory pools were introduced, and according to official sources, after the upgrade, Infinite was described as "faster" and claimed to have lower latency and higher throughput. In addition, Injective has launched iAssets, an oracle framework specifically for RWA, and Upshift's vault is a RWA DeFi vault. On May 29, Injective officially announced the launch of the on-chain foreign exchange market for the euro and the pound, using the iAsset framework. From this perspective, Injective's new narrative seems inseparable from RWA. As a veteran public chain, Injective's original core narrative was a decentralized derivatives exchange. The original Injective also evolved from a decentralized derivatives exchange to a public chain, which seems to be the same route as Hyperliquid, which is in the limelight today. However, Injective's current derivatives trading does not seem to have achieved the expected goal, with data on June 4 showing that the trading volume of the BTC contract trading pair with the highest trading volume on Injective in 24 hours was about $39.75 million, and the derivatives trading volume of the whole chain was about $90 million, compared to Hyperliquid's daily data of about $7 billion, a difference of about 77 times. Perhaps it was because it was difficult to open up the situation in crypto derivatives that Infinite chose to turn to the direction of RWA integration. On May 22, Injective's derivatives trading reached a maximum of $1.97 billion, significantly higher than other times, and has shown an upward trend in the near future. In addition, in terms of daily active users, the number of addresses from the lowest 6,300 in February has surged recently to 47,900, an increase of about 7.6 times. Although this data only ranks 12th among all public chains, it is also a relatively obvious breakthrough considering the rapid growth in the short term and surpassing public chains such as Avalanche and Berachain. However, even with the significant increase in daily active activity, Injective's TVL has not changed significantly, and has been declining since March 2024, and the current TVL is only $26.33 million. At least for now, DeFi projects on Injective are still not very attractive to funding. The short-term rebound in the token's performance is outstanding, and it is still 4 times away from the all-time high In terms of economy, its governance token, INJ, currently has a market cap of around $1.26 billion, ranking 82nd. It is down 76% from its peak market capitalization of $5.3 billion. However, it rebounded from the lowest point of $6.34 in April to $15.48, an increase of 144%, which is also relatively bright among the old public chains. However, it is unknown how long this sustained performance will last. Of course, Injective's recent actions are not limited to the above-mentioned content, such as the recent cooperation with many well-known institutions such as the Republic, Google Cloud, Deutsche Telekom MMS, etc., as well as the launch of some AI-related products and dynamics. Overall, Infinite has been actively seizing new narratives such as AI and RWA in the past year to transform. Judging from the data as of June, it has indeed played a certain role in recent months. However, from the perspective of order of magnitude, there is still a large gap with the current mainstream public chain. And this kind of chaser is not Injective's family, several celebrity public chains in the last round are now facing a similar dilemma. Many have returned to the public eye by starting to change their names and upgrade their brands. However, will this model of old wine in new bottles really give the market a new taste, or can it only be left in the packaging to look new? At present, Injective's ecological transformation and rejuvenation are still in their infancy. Upshift's inflows are more of an important test of market sentiment and a demonstration of ecological potential than a fundamental reversal. Whether its strategic tilt towards RWA can truly open up a differentiated competitive advantage and translate it into sustainable ecological prosperity and value capture still needs to overcome many challenges and be tested by the market for a long time. Whether the short-term data rally is short-lived or a positive sign in the long recovery journey is a final answer to the question. For Injective, the real test has just begun.

A silent mover on @AbstractChain is $RWA. @PLA______ silently cooking this to a new ATH and no one is even talking about it. Are you positioned?

I have to admit that RWA has been extremely popular in recent months, with countless Web2 bosses in Hong Kong lining up to put their unsellable junk on the blockchain. Of course, this has also led to a large number of intermediaries of varying quality trying to make a quick buck. I've also seen a lot of decks, but in terms of form, they mostly focus on the "issuance and on-chain" of assets. Regardless of what specific hype they are promoting, the core is the same gameplay. Recently, I discovered that the oracle I've been following, @redstone_defi, on Solana has demonstrated a new development direction for RWA: Instead of creating new assets, it adjusts the input structure of DeFi protocols to traditional financial derivatives. Specifically, it involves integrating @DriftProtocol with RedStone's RWA oracle, which means that on-chain yield strategies are no longer limited to crypto assets. Data from traditional financial instruments like treasury bonds and credit products can also start serving as price bases. Applying macro-financial analysis methods, this represents a fundamental change in the supply side of DeFi protocols. Drift is particularly crucial in this integration. As one of the most active perpetual trading platforms on Solana, Drift can be understood as a trading system where composability and high frequency coexist. After integrating the RWA price feed provided by RedStone, Drift may potentially launch derivative contracts based on actual credit spreads or T-Bill yields in the future. Traders can gain exposure to risks similar to real financial markets without leaving the chain. The marketing significance of this update is the least noteworthy; more importantly, the product structure richness and competitiveness of DeFi protocols have been greatly enhanced. In the future, as more traditional financial product data is integrated into DeFi protocols through RedStone, more interesting chemical reactions may occur. #Oracle