Penis vs Penis price

The PPP protocol continues to iterate and update, Currently, there are 6 projects running, Only a few hundred images can be grabbed each day, Even though a grabbing tool has been launched, Those who are slow still can't get them, There's nothing we can do, Under the PPP mechanism, grabbing means earning, so there's naturally no reason to let it go! The number of protocol users is steadily increasing, Slow is fast, Slowly... then suddenly For friends who are tired of the PvP mode, Remember to come and check out PPP, You can just PvP One P and no one makes a sound It doesn't matter if you lose in pump and bonk P It's also nice to come to PPP for some entertainment At least when you lose so much you can't eat, it will steadily add a chicken leg to your lunch PPP will win

Yesterday, I saw @campnetworkxyz announce their Act 3 game project lineup. As an old Gamefi player, I certainly won't miss it. After all, these are all new generation web3 native games built on Camp. It also marks the beginning of Camp's bet on the "consumer application" track, moving away from traditional projects that can't get along with DeFi, and instead focusing on building an ecosystem around products that ordinary users are willing to play and that the masses can accept. First, let me share my understanding of so-called WEB3 native games. It's not just a simple way to gain initial traffic through Camp's support, but rather a change in the underlying mechanisms such as on-chain content authorization, IP remix, and player rights distribution. I took a quick look at the nine games related to this project, and I feel that some of them are quite good. 1️⃣ HairyLabs is an on-chain MUD adventure game, which is essentially a text-based interactive RPG, but it has permanent records of on-chain assets and character states. 2️⃣ rupturelabs is building an entire web3 game ecosystem. It's somewhat like a combination of TreasureDAO and Layer3 within Polygon, focusing on platform-based operations and multi-game interoperability. 3️⃣ The Last Monarchy is a strategy game that follows the "Empire x Governance x NFT Troops" route, appealing to players who enjoy civilization and crusade-type games, especially with on-chain governance combined with Camp's authorization mechanism, which may lead to some DAO-like extended gameplay. 4️⃣ ChikoGames creates lightweight chill games that combine planting, idling, and socializing. These types of games have low barriers to entry, making them suitable for attracting novice users to come in and play while mining airdrops. 5️⃣ Relic Quest and Color are both trying to build their own "competition + collection" system, especially RGB Clash, which focuses on no-luck PvP, emphasizing competitive strategy and player skill. This is quite rare in blockchain games. 6️⃣ High Noon is an on-chain blackjack game, but thinking about the gambling elements of this game reminds me of the classic saying: "All in is a form of wisdom" 🤣 7️⃣ WagerVS is a PVP betting platform, where the victory of both players serves as the winning condition for the bet. It naturally has viral attributes, with wins and losses acting as emotional leverage. 8️⃣ Flappy Trump is a meme-oriented product that uses Trump as the material for Flappy Bird. If this product is made particularly fun, it could potentially trigger viral spread. In essence, Camp is not "incubating games" but rather establishing a game scenario system "starting from content, with on-chain authorization and incentives as a closed loop." Games are no longer just products; they are a content ecosystem node. On Camp, the materials, characters, and rules of a game can be remixed into another game's gameplay through authorization. IP is open, creation is collaborative, income is shared, and players are both consumers and co-creators. The reason @campnetworkxyz can drive all of this is key to its Origin SDK, a complete set of on-chain content authorization + remix + attribution standard toolkit, which is like the toolchain Steam provides for independent game developers, but now it serves on-chain games.

On the chain, new assets are minted every day. 、Zora、Base、Blast、Farcaster…… These platforms are like coin-producing factories, constantly releasing speculative desires. But we also have to ask the other way around: Are they really the same? Tools vs. products: Not one-size-fits-all It is a typical zero-friction speculative platform, fast minting, automatic pooling, and clear game, which is to play. Zora, on the other hand, is more like a cultural platform, focusing on $NFT, $ERC 20, and limited minting, emphasizing creator expression and cultural experimentation. The platform is just a tool, and whether it is good or not depends on the following points: 1️⃣ What is the $Token 2️⃣ Is there a good story to tell? 3️⃣ Is there community support? 4️⃣ Whether there is an incentive design 5️⃣ Is there a real flywheel (positive cycle) In the final analysis, it is not the question of the platform, but whether the assets you send out can stand firm. $Cultural Coins ≠ $Speculative Coins At the heart of the controversy is: Is Cultural Coin a scam? The answer is: most yes, but a few, no. Those $Meme/$Culture projects that survive usually do these three things: 🔥 Consensus building: The story is gripping 🔥 Community Operation: Continuous content + interaction 🔥 Mechanism design: can guide holding + re-creation + growth On the contrary, those projects that shout cultural slogans but actually rely on $KOL to pull the market generally return to zero in three weeks. So the problem is not that you say you are a cultural coin, but: Are you really doing culture, or are you cutting people in the name of culture? Investors need to upgrade their judgment Today's on-chain market is a $PvP game with extremely flat information and extremely complex behavior. ❌ Not $Meme has to be garbage ❌ Nor is it $AI or $NFT is the same as reliable ❌ It is not a certain zero on the pump, but Zora must have value What you really need to learn is the following judgment: 1️⃣ Look at the mechanism: Is tokenomics reasonable? 2️⃣ Look at the rhythm: Is there a clear rhythm and operation plan? 3️⃣ Look at the community: Is there any spontaneous content and fission kinetic energy? If you don't understand, that's fine – but don't kid yourself into thinking that this time is really different. Summary: You can call it $CreatorCoins, $AITokens, $CultureTokens, $ChainNativeAssets...... But if there is no flywheel, no rhythm, no community, just mint + pool, it is a $shitcoin of changing skins. In the end, it was a zero-sum game. The problem is not the platform, nor the $Meme, but: Do you have the ability to recognize value, Do you have the courage to admit reality?

@adderrels pledge has exceeded 1904, with a total of 3420 pledges, and the pledge rate has reached 56%, and the current market value of BRC2.0 is only 2 million