This token isn’t available on the OKX TR Exchange. You can trade it on OKX DEX instead.
ASS
ASS SHAKING SEASON price

FiG1Qp...Pump
$0.00030241
+$0.00010006
(+49.45%)
Price change for the last 24 hours

How are you feeling about ASS today?
Share your sentiments here by giving a thumbs up if you’re feeling bullish about the coin or a thumbs down if you’re feeling bearish.
Vote to view results
ASS market info
Market cap
Market cap is calculated by multiplying the circulating supply of a coin with its latest price.
Market cap = Circulating supply × Last price
Market cap = Circulating supply × Last price
Network
Underlying blockchain that supports secure, decentralized transactions.
Circulating supply
Total amount of a coin that is publicly available on the market.
Liquidity
Liquidity is the ease of buying/selling a coin on DEX. The higher the liquidity, the easier it is to complete a transaction.
Market cap
$3.02M
Network
Solana
Circulating supply
10,000,000,000 ASS
Token holders
306
Liquidity
$92,405.00
1h volume
$1.11M
4h volume
$1.77M
24h volume
$1.77M
ASS SHAKING SEASON Feed
The following content is sourced from .

PhABC
You can say this for every chain, not just ETH
Why have a chain focused exclusively on TPS or DA if they are going to be commoditized? What chain will not get eaten by stables as MOE? What chain can prevent apps from extracting MEV?

Zach Rynes | CLG
Ethereum folks will say L1 revenue is irrelevant and you shouldn’t value an L1 coin on the basis of revenue
And then turn around talk about the ETH staking yield, burn rate, low issuance, and its attractiveness as a PoS asset
Reality we’re seeing is:
1) competition on chain scalability is driving a race-to-zero for tx fees
2) apps are moving to capture their own MEV with ASS + OEV recapture + app chains
3) L2s have a 90%+ profit margin vs L1 settlement + DA costs
4) DA blobs is becoming increasingly commoditized and settlement doesn’t drive fees
5) gas tokens are being abstracted away in favor of stablecoins as a MoE
Optimize for REV-maxing or don’t, the indecision is painful
3.17K
2

apriori
Reminiscences of an MEV Operator
In this episode of Deeply Intents (🎙️,🎧), I talk to @0xTaker (MEV janitor of ) about his journey in crypto beginning with Bitcoin, progressing to building exchanges, operating as a market maker, and co-founding Aori. 0xTaker takes us down the MEV rabbit hole. We cover welfare maximization, ASS, and Intents.
Later, we spent time discussing chain abstraction through the lens of user experience and coming out on the other side with a discussion on culture based protocol development. We also discussed tokens. In particular, their different use cases. In the final segment 0xTaker opens up about his personal philosophy of building remote startups, autonomy, and purpose.
0:00 - Origins
1:26 - Starting with gaming
6:10 - Bitcoin solving payments in 2014
7:21 - Building an exchange
19:36 - Down the MEV rabbit hole
26:50 - Welfare maxing
29:55 - ASS Experimentation
33:04 - Intents
37:04 - Hyperfinancialization
42:18 - Accelerationsim
46:23 - Chain Abstraction
53:36 - Chain Abstraction is inevitable
58:18 - Protocol development & Aggregation
1:00:41 - Culture, Product, Brand
1:05:00 - User experience
1:09:49 - Aggregation breakouts
11:11:16 - Talk about tokens
1:16:36 - Trust me bro tokens
1:25:18 - VC backed infra tokens
1:28:35 - Token use cases
1:37:50 - Building remote startups
1:42:57 - Autonomy vs. employment
1:46:18 - Advice to a younger self
11.1K
32

⚜️ T̴H̴E̴ ̴C̴R̴Y̴P̴T̴O̴ ̴A̴R̴C̴H̴I̴T̴E̴C̴T̴ ⚜️
Quality + Quantity in abundance in @ArchiSuite .
Doing what we love each and every day. For the best entries and exits and market psychology.
The number of high level analysis below 👇🏼 shows the true level of commitment and quality we deliver.
No smoke and mirrors. Check out my page and the website for yourself.

Archi’s Wealth Suite ⚜️
UPDATE❗️- Archi suite’s past fortnight updates
VIP Club- market Futures Trades
+bespoke projects
$BTC $HBAR Long
$ETH $BTC Short
$SOL $FIL Long
$BTC (2nd) $SOL Long
$QUBIC $AVAX Long
$DOGE $ETH Short
$TAO $TAO Long
$ETH (2nd) $SEI Long
$BTC (3rd) $BTC Long
$DOGE (2nd) $DOGE Short
$TAO (2nd) $BTC Long
$AAVE $DOGE Long
$BTC (4th) $AAVE Long
$TAO (3rd)
$AVAX
$OTHERS
$TOTAL2
$QUBIC
$TAO (3rd)
$QUBIC (2nd)
$BTC Dominance
$USDT dominance
$ASS
$TOTAL
$TAO (4th)
$XCN
$SOL
$USDC Dominance
$USDT Dominance
$TOTAL2
As always keeping you prepared and well ahead whether bull or bear to the highest level
37.9K
6

Odaily
Original Title: The L2 vs L1 Battle that Nobody is Talking AboutOriginal Author: 0x taetaehoho, Chief Security Officer, EclipseFND Original compiler: zhouzhou, BlockBeatsEditor's note: L2 has an advantage over L1 in terms of operational costs, as L2 only pays for the cost of a single sequencer, while L1 pays for the security of all validators. L2 is uniquely positioned for speed and MEV reduction, and enables innovative economic models to maximize dApp revenue. Although L2 cannot compete with L1 in terms of liquidity, its potential in the dApp economy will drive the crypto industry's transformation from infrastructure to a profit-driven, long-term business model. Here's the original text (edited for ease of comprehension): Here's a decision matrix from a dApp perspective that analyzes whether to deploy to L1 or L2 in the current environment, assuming that both support similar types of applications (i.e., L1/L2 are not tailored for a specific application type). Aside from the relatively low MEV (Maximum Extractable Value) due to the centralization of block producers, L2 has not yet taken full advantage of other benefits. For example, despite the potential for lower transaction costs and faster throughput, Solana is still ahead of L2 in the EVM ecosystem in terms of performance and transaction costs. As Solana continues to increase throughput and advance MEV tax regimes such as ASS and MCP, L2 will need to explore new ways to help dApps maximize revenue and reduce costs. My current view is that L2 is structurally superior to L1 and can execute dApp revenue maximization strategies more quickly. One of the key roles of the execution layer in maximizing application revenue is how fees/MEV are allocated. Currently, MEV tax or fee sharing is only possible with "honest block proposers", i.e., proposers who are willing to follow prioritization rules, or share revenue with the app according to preset rules. Another way is to allocate a portion of the base fee of EIP 1559 to the dApp that the user interacts with, a mechanism that Canto CSR and EVMOS seem to employ. At the very least, this will allow dApps to increase their ability to bid on their own MEV yields, making them more competitive in the deal inclusion market. In the L2 ecosystem, if a block proposer is run by a team (i.e., a single block proposer), then it is inherently "honest" and can guarantee the transparency of the block construction algorithm through reputation mechanisms or TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) technology. Currently, there are two L2s that have adopted fee sharing and prioritization block construction, and Flashbots Builder is able to provide similar functionality to the OP-Stack ecosystem with minor changes. In the SVM (Solana Virtual Machine) ecosystem, Jito-like infrastructure can redistribute MEV revenue to dApps on a pro-rata basis (e.g., in terms of CUs, Blast uses a similar mechanism). This means that L2 can enable these features sooner while L1 is still working on MCP and built-in ASS options (which Solana may be working on, but there are no CSR-like renaissance plans in the EVM ecosystem). Because L2 can rely on trusted block producers or TEE technology, there is no need to enforce OCAproof, so the MRMC (Revenue, Cost, MEV Competition) model of the dApp can be adjusted more quickly. But the advantage of L2 is not just the speed of development or the ability to redistribute fees, they are also subject to fewer structural constraints. The survival conditions of the L1 ecosystem (i.e., the conditions under which the validator network is maintained) can be described by the following equation: total number of validators × validator operating costs + staking capital requirements × capital costs < TEV (inflation + total network fees + MEV tips) From a single validator's perspective: validator operating costs + staking capital requirements × capital costs > inflation gains + transaction fees + MEV earnings In other words, L1 wants to reduce inflation or reduce fees (by integrating with dApps There is a hard constraint - validators must remain profitable! This limitation will be more pronounced if validator operating costs are high. For example, Helius points out in his SIMD 228 related article that if inflation is reduced according to the proposed issuance curve, at 70% stake, 3.4% of current validators may exit due to declining profitability (assuming REV maintains volatility levels in 2024). REV (MEV Share in Staking Yield) is extremely volatile: On the day of the TRUMP event, the REV share was as high as 66% · On November 19, 2024, the REV share is 50% • Currently, at the time of writing, the REV share is only 14.4% This means that in the L1 ecosystem, there is a ceiling on reducing inflation or adjusting fee allocations due to the pressure on validator monetization, and L2 is not subject to this, allowing more freedom to explore strategies to optimize dApp revenue. OLANA validators are currently facing higher operating costs, which directly limits the "shareable profit margins", especially as inflation falls. If Solana validators have to rely on REV (MEV share in staking yield) to remain profitable, then the total percentage that can be distributed to dApps will be severely limited. This presents an interesting trade-off: the higher the operating cost of validators, the higher the overall take-rate of the network must be. From the perspective of the network as a whole, the following formula must be met: total network operating costs (including capital costs)< The situation is similar for total network REV + issuance Ethereum, but with less impact. Currently, the APR (Annualized Yield) of ETH staking is between 2.9% -3.6%, with about 20% coming from REV. This also means that Ethereum's ability to optimize dApp monetization is also subject to validator monetization requirements. This is where L2 comes in in a natural way. On L2, the total cost of operation of the entire network is only the cost of operating a sequencer, and there is no capital cost because there is no staking capital requirement. Compared to L1, which has a large number of validators, L2 requires a very small profit margin to maintain breakeven. This means that while maintaining the same profit margin, L2 can allocate more value to the dApp ecosystem, which can greatly increase the revenue margin of dApps. L2's network cost will always be lower than L1's size because L2 only needs to "borrow" L1's security (taking up part of L1's block space) on a regular basis, and L1 must bear the security cost of all of its block space. L1 vs L2 Battle: Who Will Dominate the dApp Economy? By definition, L2 cannot compete with L1 in terms of liquidity, and since the user base is still largely concentrated in L1, L2 has struggled to directly compete with L1 at the user level (although Base is changing this trend). But so far, very few L2s have truly played to their unique strengths as L2s – the characteristics that come with the centralization of block production. On the surface, the most discussed advantages of L2 are: mitigating malicious MEV and increasing transaction throughput (some L2s are exploring this direction), but more importantly, the next major battleground in the L1 vs L2 battle will be the dApp economic model. Advantages of L2: Non-OCAproof TFM (Non-Strong Composability TFM) Advantages of L1: CSR (Contract Self-Operated Income) or MCP (Minimum Consensus Protocol) + MEV Tax This competition is the best thing for the crypto industry because it directly brings: dApp revenue is maximized, cost is minimized, and developers are incentivized to build better dApps. Changing the incentives in the crypto industry from the infrastructure token premium (L(x) premium) of the past, to a long-term crypto business driven by profits. Combined with the clarity of DeFi regulation, token value capture at the protocol layer, and the entry of institutional capital, the crypto market has entered an era with "actual business models" as the core. Just as we've seen an influx of money into infrastructure over the past few years, driving innovation in areas such as applied cryptography, performance engineering, consensus mechanisms, and more, today's competition between chains will bring about a massive shift in the industry's incentive structure and attract the brightest minds to the crypto application layer. Now, it's the real starting point for the massive adoption of crypto! Link to original article
Show original



5.31K
0
ASS price performance in USD
The current price of ass-shaking-season is $0.00030241. Over the last 24 hours, ass-shaking-season has increased by +49.45%. It currently has a circulating supply of 10,000,000,000 ASS and a maximum supply of 10,000,000,000 ASS, giving it a fully diluted market cap of $3.02M. The ass-shaking-season/USD price is updated in real-time.
5m
-7.06%
1h
-30.87%
4h
+49.45%
24h
+49.45%
About ASS SHAKING SEASON (ASS)
ASS FAQ
What’s the current price of ASS SHAKING SEASON?
The current price of 1 ASS is $0.00030241, experiencing a +49.45% change in the past 24 hours.
Can I buy ASS on OKX TR?
No, currently ASS is unavailable on OKX TR. To stay updated on when ASS becomes available, sign up for notifications or follow us on social media. We’ll announce new cryptocurrency additions as soon as they’re listed.
Why does the price of ASS fluctuate?
The price of ASS fluctuates due to the global supply and demand dynamics typical of cryptocurrencies. Its short-term volatility can be attributed to significant shifts in these market forces.
How much is 1 ASS SHAKING SEASON worth today?
Currently, one ASS SHAKING SEASON is worth $0.00030241. For answers and insight into ASS SHAKING SEASON's price action, you're in the right place. Explore the latest ASS SHAKING SEASON charts and trade responsibly with OKX TR.
What is cryptocurrency?
Cryptocurrencies, such as ASS SHAKING SEASON, are digital assets that operate on a public ledger called blockchains. Learn more about coins and tokens offered on OKX TR and their different attributes, which includes live prices and real-time charts.
When was cryptocurrency invented?
Thanks to the 2008 financial crisis, interest in decentralized finance boomed. Bitcoin offered a novel solution by being a secure digital asset on a decentralized network. Since then, many other tokens such as ASS SHAKING SEASON have been created as well.
Monitor crypto prices on an exchange
Watch this video to learn about what happens when you move your money to a crypto exchange.
Disclaimer
The social content on this page ("Content"), including but not limited to tweets and statistics provided by LunarCrush, is sourced from third parties and provided "as is" for informational purposes only. OKX TR does not guarantee the quality or accuracy of the Content, and the Content does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or recommendation; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold digital assets; or (iii) financial, accounting, legal or tax advice. Digital assets, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk, can fluctuate greatly. The price and performance of the digital assets are not guaranteed and may change without notice.
OKX TR does not provide investment or asset recommendations. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances. For further details, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Warning. By using the third-party website ("TPW"), you accept that any use of the TPW will be subject to and governed by the terms of the TPW. Unless expressly stated in writing, OKX TR and its affiliates (“OKX TR”) are not in any way associated with the owner or operator of the TPW. You agree that OKX TR is not responsible or liable for any loss, damage and any other consequences arising from your use of the TPW. Please be aware that using a TPW may result in a loss or diminution of your assets. Product may not be available in all jurisdictions.
OKX TR does not provide investment or asset recommendations. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances. For further details, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Warning. By using the third-party website ("TPW"), you accept that any use of the TPW will be subject to and governed by the terms of the TPW. Unless expressly stated in writing, OKX TR and its affiliates (“OKX TR”) are not in any way associated with the owner or operator of the TPW. You agree that OKX TR is not responsible or liable for any loss, damage and any other consequences arising from your use of the TPW. Please be aware that using a TPW may result in a loss or diminution of your assets. Product may not be available in all jurisdictions.