"What happened to the K platform? Who pays for the blood loss of users? 》 A week ago, Yuhu @Punk9277 boss mentioned in a discussion with me: welcome to the Ice Frog supervision platform. Who would have thought that in less than a week, I had to give my "supervision" opinion again. This time, we don't have emotions, we only talk about problems, and we implore the K platform and Boss Yuhu to respond. First of all, as a new platform, what is the most fundamental bottom line? I think it's nothing more than fairness and transparency. So let me ask, why did the project party send coins three days in advance, pay attention, these coins are issued to users, so why do you, as intermediaries, drag on and let the price fall? ? Negligence or intentionality? Technical Questions?? If the technology is not good, why do you want to take over the business, but the loss of user interests has to come at the cost of your technology? Further, why is the wear and gas of your swap so high, making the already lost users even worse??? I don't speculate whether you are malicious, but the objective result of all your actions is that users lose money. So, why is it not the first time to compensate and solve the problem after it comes out, but to throw the pot and fuzz it? Is this how your so-called "valuing user feedback" is reflected? I really don't like to engage in opposition, and many users are actually willing to "supervise" and "wait" with great restraint, even if they are cut, they still hope that the platform can make changes. But if the platform always insists that it is right and even refuses to respond positively, then this restraint will no longer exist, and will instead become a rights defense and endless crusade. Finally, I sincerely hope that saying one thing and doing one thing is not your values, and don't become the "Xibei" of Web3.