Recently, the discussion of @irys_xyz in the Kaito Yap rankings has been quite hot, and I found that many Baozi are interested in the difference between @irys_xyz and other storage chains in previous tweets, so I have compiled a comparison with Filecoin and Arweave. 🧩 Storage mode: • Filecoin: Short-term storage (up to 540 days) with renewal at maturity • Arweave: Forever stored, one-time payment • Irys: Short-term + permanent. 🧩 Availability: • Filecoin: Contracts have limited functionality and cannot directly manipulate data • Arweave: Only save files, and the logic depends on external modules • Irys: EVM contracts can read and write data natively and embed logic 🧩 Reading experience: • Filecoin: Often wait hours or more • Arweave: Small files are fast, large files are slower • Irys: Multi-ledger architecture, low latency, and instant data retrieval 🧩 Pricing Model: • Filecoin: Market pricing, high volatility • Arweave: Pegged AR token with high and volatile...
Show original
35.07K
130
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX TR is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX TR is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.