Doubts about this matter:
Is Dlyan an official person, and can he be trusted?
Does the proposal from the DAO have legal binding power, or are there other valid agreements in private?
1. Is @0xDylan_ really an official person from WLFI? His profile states he is an advisor, which is a very ambiguous position, as advisors usually cannot represent the official stance. Additionally, I couldn't find any information about him on the WLFI official website, and the official Twitter account does not follow him back.
He used to reply in Chinese regarding WLFI matters, so he might be someone from the team or closely associated with it? Does that make his replies credible?
2. Are there other agreements that bind the DAO's proposals? Do the votes in the DAO have legal or binding power? This proposal was initiated by WLFI itself; what is the reason for its retraction? It seems they found the market interest too high and didn't want to give it away for free, as investors in the crypto space are often played by projects, which is not surprising.
Aave and WLFI token allocation controversy event viewpoints summary:
Aave's perspective (represented by Stani.eth):
1️⃣ The "Aave V3 instance" proposal put forward by the WLFI team was approved by Aave DAO vote on December 13.
2️⃣ According to the proposal, AaveDAO will receive 7% of the total supply of WLFI tokens as an ecological cooperation reward.
3️⃣ The agreement is still valid, and optimistic estimates of "Aave treasury receiving $2.5 billion WLFI" have been forwarded.
WLFI's perspective (suspected team member Dylan_0x):
1️⃣ Directly denies the proposal related news that "Aave will receive 7% of the total WLFI tokens."
2️⃣ Through crypto media Wu Shuo, it is stated that this allocation plan is "fake news."
⚠️ Current status/questions:
Aave has provided a proposal link as evidence, stating that the proposal was created by the WLFI team;
Dylan_0x's Twitter profile indicates he is a WLFI consultant, but no related information was found in the official documents.
The WLFI team has not yet officially responded through official channels.
11.67K
3
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX TR is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX TR is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.