I am realizing @solana is still heavily underrated. It has successfully accrued value to itself as a single ecosystem since day one - whereas Ethereum has been diluted over and over with endless L2 spam. The L2 experiment has played out and while Base saw success, the jury is still out on others like X Layer and Ink. as a result, we're seeing similar teams instead spinning up their own standalone L1 instead e.g. Tether/Plasma/Stabl, Circle, Converge etc. it is exceptionally hard to fork solana and have it function well without a boatload of infrastructure in place or have a very specific vision and usecase like @FogoChain. Over the long term as value within EVM accrues to countless ecosystems and teams, Solana lives in it's own world with no competition and as this continues, assets and stablecoins will always find a path to Solana somehow, either via bridging or becoming native to the ecosystem. Out of all the stablecoin issuers, tokenization platforms, asset issuers, etc the one chain that is always a non-negotiable is Solana. No other chain is on the same level with respect to demand from these players. the argument can be made because the teams in question know it will be difficult (although not really because of @wormhole) and so they prioritize it early but it's still true all the same. The knock on effect of this is Solana will remain monolithic in nature which has all sorts of psychological and social effects, whereas Ethereum will simply become the E in EVM (which is almost already is).