😴 Before bed, I thought about the token structure of $KET and why it has more extensibility than most meme projects. From the results, $KET is the least typical meme in recent times: it doesn't have a continuous explosive growth period, but it does have a long tail of a stable rising price curve. To explain this phenomenon, we can't just say "there's a mechanism"; we need to start from the three core economic logics: supply, release rhythm, and use cases. 1. Token Distribution The total supply of $KET is 1 billion tokens, which is not a small number, but the structural division is very restrained. The official team has never heavily promoted this distribution, but on-chain tracking shows: 🔸 The liquidity pool + initial market distribution accounts for about 25%, which is enough to support depth and not be "thin enough to be manipulated." 🔸 The community incentive pool + eKET reward release accounts for about 30%, which is currently the most active part. 🔸 The team/advisors/contributors have about 20% locked, but there is a 24-month linear release + cliff (lock-up period). 🔸 The remaining approximately 25% is reserved for future buybacks, strategic partnerships, NFT interactions, and other uses. The key point is: there are no VC private placements, and no massive airdrops that could crash the market. Among the current 1 billion in circulation, the portion that can actually enter CEX and DEX for frequent trading is very small; the vast majority of the circulation is actually locked in behavior-binding mechanisms and interaction structures. This means: market selling pressure is predictable but won't be sudden; the chip structure is visible but not concentrated. 2. Release Mechanism Many projects fall into a dead end because they rely on airdrops to attract new users and unlocks for early users, resulting in new users not being able to obtain meaningful positions while old users wait for exit windows. $KET solves this problem by: eKET mapping structure: initially obtaining points through behavior, then uniformly claiming $KET quarterly; Each mapping cycle sets a "time + activity" dual-factor threshold, forming a cleansing mechanism; The truly circulating airdrop releases in the market without behavior binding are very rare. This brings two benefits: 🔸 Early community members must remain active to unlock tokens. 🔸 Airdrop recipients cannot directly crash the market because there is no "immediate cash-out" channel. It effectively uses a slow release + continuous behavior proof structure to kick out users who "take and leave." 3. Use Cases and Destruction Logic Many projects talk about deflation, but $KET's deflation is tied to use cases, not abstract destruction. Its three-layer use case logic is as follows: ① Behavior Binding: All community governance and ecological interactions require wallet holders to possess a certain amount of $KET. Voting weight will further be tied to NFT and orb point levels. Under this mechanism, $KET is not just a voting ticket but a "participation right" token. ② Fee Buyback + Automatic Destruction: Every on-chain operation incurs a small fee, automatically triggering a 0.3% destruction mechanism. This is not a "potential future execution"; it is already written into the contract and runs at any time. ③ Revenue Buyback: @YellowCatDAO officially revealed in the TG group that 20% of the revenue from ecological products (AI bots, NFT platforms, etc.) will be regularly used for secondary market buybacks and enter the destruction pool. This forms a feedback loop of "as ecological use grows, destruction also grows." This is not simply "burning coins to hype up," but integrating destruction behavior into the entire ecological revenue distribution. 4. Future Structural Continuation From the current development, $KET is likely to become an identity asset. Based on current community governance behavior: NFTs may bind voting rights, proposal rights, and ecological whitelist channels. The orb score + KET holdings + NFT form a trinity user profile system. Future GameFi, content platforms, and even cross-chain bridge usage rights will extend from this. This is different from SHIBA's past reliance on meme hype + Shibaswap ecology to drive up prices. $KET's path is closer to "on-chain behavior - data layer - identity binding - rights distribution." This is actually a gap in the application ecology on the @AVAX chain. If it fills the gap in the NFT + DAO direction, the role of the entire token will upgrade from "voting certificate" to "ecological passport" in the future. In summary: The token model of #KET is not about making you guess when it will hype, but about making it clear: when to participate, what to do, and what you can exchange for after doing it. In this structure, "price increase" is just a byproduct of the structure being validated. | 0xkevin (🖤 , 💙) OKX Feed

😴 Before bed, I thought about the token structure of $KET and why it has more extensibility than most meme projects. From the results, $KET is the least typical meme in recent times: it doesn't have a continuous explosive growth period, but it does have a long tail of a stable rising price curve. To explain this phenomenon, we can't just say "there's a mechanism"; we need to start from the three core economic logics: supply, release rhythm, and use cases. 1. Token Distribution The total supply of $KET is 1 billion tokens, which is not a small number, but the structural division is very restrained. The official team has never heavily promoted this distribution, but on-chain tracking shows: 🔸 The liquidity pool + initial market distribution accounts for about 25%, which is enough to support depth and not be "thin enough to be manipulated." 🔸 The community incentive pool + eKET reward release accounts for about 30%, which is currently the most active part. 🔸 The team/advisors/contributors have about 20% locked, but there is a 24-month linear release + cliff (lock-up period). 🔸 The remaining approximately 25% is reserved for future buybacks, strategic partnerships, NFT interactions, and other uses. The key point is: there are no VC private placements, and no massive airdrops that could crash the market. Among the current 1 billion in circulation, the portion that can actually enter CEX and DEX for frequent trading is very small; the vast majority of the circulation is actually locked in behavior-binding mechanisms and interaction structures. This means: market selling pressure is predictable but won't be sudden; the chip structure is visible but not concentrated. 2. Release Mechanism Many projects fall into a dead end because they rely on airdrops to attract new users and unlocks for early users, resulting in new users not being able to obtain meaningful positions while old users wait for exit windows. $KET solves this problem by: eKET mapping structure: initially obtaining points through behavior, then uniformly claiming $KET quarterly; Each mapping cycle sets a "time + activity" dual-factor threshold, forming a cleansing mechanism; The truly circulating airdrop releases in the market without behavior binding are very rare. This brings two benefits: 🔸 Early community members must remain active to unlock tokens. 🔸 Airdrop recipients cannot directly crash the market because there is no "immediate cash-out" channel. It effectively uses a slow release + continuous behavior proof structure to kick out users who "take and leave." 3. Use Cases and Destruction Logic Many projects talk about deflation, but $KET's deflation is tied to use cases, not abstract destruction. Its three-layer use case logic is as follows: ① Behavior Binding: All community governance and ecological interactions require wallet holders to possess a certain amount of $KET. Voting weight will further be tied to NFT and orb point levels. Under this mechanism, $KET is not just a voting ticket but a "participation right" token. ② Fee Buyback + Automatic Destruction: Every on-chain operation incurs a small fee, automatically triggering a 0.3% destruction mechanism. This is not a "potential future execution"; it is already written into the contract and runs at any time. ③ Revenue Buyback: @YellowCatDAO officially revealed in the TG group that 20% of the revenue from ecological products (AI bots, NFT platforms, etc.) will be regularly used for secondary market buybacks and enter the destruction pool. This forms a feedback loop of "as ecological use grows, destruction also grows." This is not simply "burning coins to hype up," but integrating destruction behavior into the entire ecological revenue distribution. 4. Future Structural Continuation From the current development, $KET is likely to become an identity asset. Based on current community governance behavior: NFTs may bind voting rights, proposal rights, and ecological whitelist channels. The orb score + KET holdings + NFT form a trinity user profile system. Future GameFi, content platforms, and even cross-chain bridge usage rights will extend from this. This is different from SHIBA's past reliance on meme hype + Shibaswap ecology to drive up prices. $KET's path is closer to "on-chain behavior -> data layer -> identity binding -> rights distribution." This is actually a gap in the application ecology on the @AVAX chain. If it fills the gap in the NFT + DAO direction, the role of the entire token will upgrade from "voting certificate" to "ecological passport" in the future. In summary: The token model of #KET is not about making you guess when it will hype, but about making it clear: when to participate, what to do, and what you can exchange for after doing it. In this structure, "price increase" is just a byproduct of the structure being validated.

"The hidden big move of Ket that everyone ignores, NFTs are about to be issued!" In the crypto world, some projects quickly rise to trending topics and then fade into silence; while others, from the very beginning, are not chasing hype but are laying a long-term foundation around their underlying structure. $KET is more like the latter. Ket proves with real actions that memes are not the end, but just the beginning. Many people have overlooked the NFTs that may be issued next 🪂 › ••••••••• ‹ Why are NFTs key, and not just "another round of assets"? In the past, many projects issued NFTs after launching their tokens, mostly to "sell images + hype scarcity." But for Ket, this batch of upcoming NFTs is not just for another round of monetization, but to complete its on-chain identity system and incentive stratification mechanism. Founder @nobsfud has hinted multiple times recently that they are building identity-related modules. Combined with the existing interactive data structure and governance model, these NFTs are likely to serve the following purposes: 🔸 Bind behavior records: Holding a certain type of interactive NFT means you have a real on-chain participation history. 🔸 Change permission structure: Specific NFTs lower proposal thresholds and increase governance weight. 🔸 Identity level weighting: After binding behavior + holdings, user identity levels can be elevated, granting access to more resource priority pools. You can think of this as an "on-chain passport" in the web3 world, not just collectibles or avatars. 🟡 Behind this mechanism, it actually connects "power" and "behavior" through NFTs and $KET. 🔶 Core: Organizing a community system with a long-tail incentive structure based on tokens. @yellowcatdao's model design skips the traditional meme project path of "relying on hype to support market value, relying on trends to explain concepts," and instead starts deploying structural functional components from the very early stages of the community. On-chain points system Orb: A way to map interactive behaviors as on-chain identity traces. It is directly linked to governance rights, NFT rewards, and future dividend pools; it's not enough to just claim you are an "old user." Community governance: The Snapshot model is in use, but more importantly, holding #KET alone is not enough to influence decisions; holders need to participate, interact, and execute. This truly makes "participation" a part of the asset. Under this series of mechanisms, KET is doing something not so "emotional"—building a complete self-operating community incentive system that transforms on-chain behavior data into the underlying fuel for organizational autonomy. @yellowcatdao's special position in the @avax ecosystem. Avalanche is one of the few public chains that currently finds a relative balance between efficiency, stability, and developer friendliness, and among its meme and cultural projects, $KET is one of the most complete in terms of mechanisms. Most meme coins tend to direct users towards trading from the very beginning; however, KET's path has been closer to "behavioral structure building" from the start: you are here to participate, not to cash out. What you gain is not "dividend eligibility," but a ticket to "whether you can continue to participate." If it really introduces on-chain identity, cross-chain mapping, GameFi interactions, or NFT stratified governance in the future, its operation will increasingly resemble a self-organizing platform product. In summary: If KET issues NFTs in the future, it will definitely be a significant length of participation. Because NFTs are the last piece of the puzzle for Ket's gameplay, their value is absolutely not low! Finally, #cookie @cookiedotfun ends in 2 days, I made a mistake earlier 😭 @neko18666 @0xyi666 @hanhanbtc @btcfuyao @lijiaoshou12 @dakuan_x @xiaomolianyou @crypto_azh @0xsmall_ Big names on the list~

5.57K

The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX TR is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX TR is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.