Good morning, #Ket, there's only one day left, persistence is victory. The leaderboard only shows 25 people, and it's completely heated up! But don't be discouraged, this time at least 100 people will be covered, possibly up to 300, as hinted by the founder's vote on Tuesday! Everyone, make a final push on the last day, post your #ket tweets in the comments, and I will support each one of you! No one knows who will be in the top 100, but you must believe in miracles! › ••••••••• ‹ @yellowcatdao comprehensive introduction On the #Avalanche chain, $KET is a special existence. It is not the opposite of a meme, nor does it claim to be an authoritative functional financial asset. It is attempting to build a "behavior-driven community system with feedback mechanisms," using the most basic DeFi tools, the lightest NFT system, and the most restrained governance logic to form a sufficiently self-consistent economic closed loop @nobsfud. Breaking down the project mechanism: Tokens as anchor points. $KET is not a distribution certificate that "loses effectiveness after incentives." It binds on-chain identity, connecting multiple entry points such as staking rewards, points generation, NFT unlocking, and community governance, serving as a unified interface for multiple behavioral paths. This is to make the token a structural tool rather than just a chip. The Orb system provides a delay mechanism for participation and feedback. Traditional incentives either distribute instantly or rely entirely on ranking mechanisms, which cannot support medium-term expectations. The Orb, however, acts like a point system that continuously accumulates "participation temperature." The emphasis behind this system design is not on the amount of participation, but on the signal density of "valuable behaviors." NFTs are identity layers rather than decorative avatars. In the context of #KET, NFTs are carriers of community members' behavioral traces, expected to bind reputation points, Orb accumulation, and task completion in the future, becoming an on-chain Passport for Web3. This is not a traditional PFP, but a user front-end expression of structured data at the DAO level. DAO governance is an information processing structure, not a voting ritual. @yellowcatdao's governance does not pursue high-frequency decision-making but exists as a resource allocation mechanism. Snapshot leaves a "communication channel" for the community, but what truly takes effect is whether proposals can connect to actual behavioral nodes. This type of DAO is more like a management panel for an automated strategy system rather than a democratic voting ritual. KET does not emphasize "narrative," but rather "structural stability." You rarely see @yellowcatdao promoting so-called narratives in a grand manner. It resembles an organization oriented towards technical experimentation, validating whether the on-chain behavior mapping mechanism can continuously operate with extremely low costs and noise. There is no massive financing, no "AI web3 track" label, only continuously iterating interaction paths and a clear community feedback model. This design style is very counterintuitive. It does not create narrative-driven content but directly builds systems. You might think it lacks stories and highlights, but precisely because it has no nonsense, it runs extremely cleanly. Compared to Doge's "emotional flow leverage" and SHIB's ecological hard bundling structure, $KET seems to be attempting to create a cold start model that connects on-chain behavioral incentive logic, DAO decision-making logic, and NFT identity logic for meme-based assets. It is not yet fully formed, but each of its components is moving towards one goal: to generate data from on-chain behavior and let the data drive incentives and participation in return. The high performance and low cost on the Avalanche chain provide ideal soil for this "intensive interaction + frequent feedback" design style.