USD1's Game Breaker Just now, $B exploded, and some people in some groups are analyzing why, don't you want Binance to be on the spot? What years and months are you pro, the Qing Dynasty is dead, do you still think it is the previous years of Binance's ultra-high spot premium? Take a look at the recent climb ladder on the spot $Haedal, with a market capitalization of 28.8M, FDV148M. $B As a fully circulating token, the market capitalization has long been beyond the scope of traditional ladder valuation, and his narrative has only one from beginning to end, and that is - $USD 1. Its valuation has also been closely related to leveraging USD1. If you don't understand it, you don't dare to copy the bottom, and you can't hold it, because the valuation anchor is wrong. Two days ago, Binance's official announcement of USD1 brought a wave of local craze, and it was boiling for a while, and everyone rushed to show their loyalty, and I thought that there were more people who came to share the $B pie. As a result, when I looked at it last night, the number of mints of $USD 1 was only a little more limited, which didn't match the momentum outside. Taking another look at the $USD 1 trading pair, good guys, $B still occupies most of the country, and throwing away the stablecoin pair is basically a monopoly. What does this mean? It shows that the application of USD1 has been implemented very early, and it is not large enough to move the water stored in the previous reservoir. For a stablecoin, the amount of money printed = the ability to make money = influence, so even if the attention has become higher than before, it is impossible for @worldlibertyfi to be satisfied, the game has not been broken, and there are not enough people and projects to really start supporting the expansion of USD1. If I were a @ZachWitkoff and @worldlibertyfi team, how would I be willing to incentivize the market to adopt more of my stablecoin? If a project takes the initiative to jump out and express its full support for USD1, will I be willing to give it support and make it perform well, which in turn will attract more projects to follow? Some people say that I jumped the prophet a few days ago, you can think about it according to my thinking, as long as the people of WLFI are not stupid, they are people who really want to do things, and it is a logical thing to buy a little currency with their own address to support $B. It's easy to scold a conspiracy, but it's hard to think independently. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the past two days, we can see that the market has reacted a little, such as following the USD1 strategy of @BUILDonBsc_AI, but the vast majority of the project parties have not, or even just symbolically rubbed the heat. In terms of trading volume, the loudest $STO at that time, the 24-hour USD1 trading volume was only less than 60,000, and the slightly larger volume was not so loud $BANK and $Merl, both around 600,000. $B What about it? 255M 。 If you reflect the attitude by the trading volume, then it is clear who the real supporters are. Or empathy: If it seems that the market is not paying enough attention now, then the best way to break the game is to continue to set an example. So I don't think @worldlibertyfi wallet buying coins is over. Let's see if they will continue to introduce some means to stimulate the market. This includes, but is not limited to, more in-depth support for @BNBCHAINZH ecologically pro-USD1 projects. $B has the opportunity to continue to be a game-breaker for others to see. It's also a great way to show your gratitude and goodwill to Binance's support of USD1, as everyone knows how strategically important bnbchain is to Binance right now, after all, @cz_binance retweets bnbchain's data almost every day. This logic is also very smooth and make sense, so let's continue to call it Yangmou. Hopefully I'm not a leek fantasies 😂😂