Party Vs Party price

On-chain, new assets are being minted every day. Zora, Base, Blast, Farcaster... these platforms are like coin factories, constantly releasing speculative desires. But we should also ask: Are they all the same in what they produce? Tools vs Products: No one-size-fits-all They are typical zero-friction speculative platforms, quickly minting coins and automatically pooling them, with clear games—it's all about play. Zora, on the other hand, is more like a cultural platform, focusing on $NFT, $ERC20, limited minting, emphasizing creator expression and cultural experimentation. Platforms are just tools; their quality depends on the following points: 1️⃣ What kind of $Token is issued 2️⃣ Is there a good story told 3️⃣ Is there community support 4️⃣ Is there incentive design 5️⃣ Is there a real flywheel (positive cycle) Ultimately, it's not about the platform; it's about whether the assets you issue can stand on their own. $CulturalCoin ≠ $SpeculativeCoin The core of the controversy is: Is a cultural coin a scam? The answer is: Most are, but a few are not. Those $Meme / $Culture projects that survive usually do three things: 🔥 Consensus building: The story is engaging 🔥 Community operation: Continuous content + interaction 🔥 Mechanism design: Can guide holding + re-creation + growth Conversely, those projects that shout cultural slogans but rely on $KOLs to pump usually go to zero in three weeks. So the question isn't whether you say you're a cultural coin, but rather: Are you really doing culture, or are you just using culture as a guise to exploit people? Investors need to upgrade their judgment Today's on-chain market is an extremely flat information landscape with extremely complex behaviors—a $PvP game. ❌ Not every $Meme is garbage ❌ Not every $AI or $NFT is reliable ❌ And just because something is pumped doesn't mean it will go to zero; what Zora mints may indeed have value. What you really need to learn are the following types of judgment: 1️⃣ Look at the mechanism: Is the tokenomics reasonable? 2️⃣ Look at the rhythm: Is there a clear rhythm and operational plan? 3️⃣ Look at the community: Is there spontaneous content and viral momentum? If you can't understand it, that's okay—but please don't deceive yourself by saying this time is really different. In summary: You can call it $CreatorCoins, $AITokens, $CultureTokens, $ChainNativeAssets... But if there's no flywheel, no rhythm, no community, just pure minting + pooling, then it's just a rebranded $shitcoin. In the end, it's still a zero-sum game. The issue isn't the platform, nor is it the $Meme, but rather: Do you have the ability to recognize value, And do you have the courage to acknowledge reality.

@adderrels pledge has exceeded 1904, with a total of 3420 pledges, and the pledge rate has reached 56%, and the current market value of BRC2.0 is only 2 million

Phantom Perps launched ~1 week ago and has been a resounding success. Phantom has accumulated ~$267k in fees since launching, with Hyperliquid receiving a similar amount as well. These fees are almost certainly all additive (10k+ new users), and they are also accelerating, with ~$81k fees accrued in the last day. I expect daily Phantom fees to reach $500k/day in short order -- $500k more free cash flow per day that Hyperliquid did not have before I really don't think anyone understands how big of an integration this is and the potential for what is coming Phantom has > 15 million monthly active users. It is quite possibly the single best front end distribution platform in all of crypto. They are an all-star team with a sleek UI and chose to work with Hyperliquid to integrate perps. Not only that, but they nailed it. The product is great (go try it) Over time, this distribution network will onboard hundreds of thousands of users, expanding the platform and bringing in plenty of new fees Further, Phantom has publicly stated that this is just the beginning, and that the perps integration represents a larger commitment to Hyperliquid. I expect many more features to be rolled out. The obvious ones are HyperEVM integration and spot trading $HYPE currently has just 146,400 holders. Solana by comparison has >10 million holders If Phantom integrates spot trading and allows users to buy $HYPE, it will be one of the single biggest unlocks in terms of accessibility. It is still very hard to buy $HYPE for the average retailer, and I cannot express how important token distribution is for price action and ultimately valuation / token price Phantom is completely aligned as well, given they will make 50% or more of any fees accrued. This type of alignment is only possible because of the selfless, scalable design of builder codes Phantom <> Hyperliquid will be a partnership for the history books Hyperliquid