StakeStone's DeFi 3.0 play: "UnionPay + Alipay" in the crypto world makes the industry say goodbye to "internal friction"

Author: Ice Frog

In the crypto world, liquidity determines everything, without sufficient liquidity, no matter how good DeFi is, it is only a "backwater" and cannot really play its value, and with the continuous expansion of the public chain ecology, the separation of capital liquidity between chains has become the biggest obstacle to the development of the industry.

StakeStone has accurately hit the pain point of this industry, trying to become the "UnionPay + Alipay" of the crypto world, building a full-chain liquidity infrastructure, allowing funds to flow freely between different public chains, and bidding farewell to the liquidity dilemma of fragmentation, inefficiency, and involution.

It can be said that StakeStone is trying to build a financial infrastructure in the DeFi 3.0 era, so that the entire blockchain industry can bid farewell to the meaningless battle for liquidity and truly enter a new era of free flow of funds.

Below, I try to use the most popular language to give an analysis of this project:

1. StakeStone's positioning: a game-changer for the full-chain liquidity infrastructure

1.1 Pain Points and Solutions

Industry pain points:

Liquidity segmentation, single income, and different returns of the new old chain

The current blockchain cross-chain transfer of money requires complex operations and high fees, and the full-chain technology is a bridge to open up these silos, so that money can flow freely, and you can use whichever chain you want;

From the perspective of cross-chain liquidity, there are currently cross-chain liquidity fragmentation (for example, it is difficult for BTC to participate in DeFi), a single income strategy (token incentives are not practical and unsustainable), and it is difficult for emerging chains to start cold. More generally, there are three main points

1⃣ The money is "stuck" on a chain and cannot be moved. For example, Bitcoin can only lie on the Bitcoin chain, and ETH can only be used in DeFi on the Ethereum chain.

2⃣ The new chain is not used, and the old chain is too crowded. For example, when the new public chain was first launched, no one saved money, and the old chain (such as Ethereum) overflowed funds but had low returns.

3⃣ Earnings are unsustainable. Many projects attract users with high token rewards, and once the tokens are stopped, the funds are immediately withdrawn.

StakeStone's solution: three core products to solve the full chain liquidity allocation

1⃣STONE (interest-bearing ETH): Aggregate multi-chain ETH liquidity and dynamically optimize the yield strategy.

2⃣SBTC/STONEBTC (Full-Chain BTC and Interest-Bearing BTC): Unify the BTC liquidity pool and activate the DeFi value of BTC.

3⃣LiquidityPad: Connects the flow of funds between Ethereum and emerging chains to achieve two-way value capture.

1.2 Uniqueness of the StakeStone Solution

If we clarify the uniqueness of StakeStone's solution, we can use the "Alipay + UnionPay" complex in the crypto world as a visual analogy.

1⃣ Alipay-level experience

STONE: Like Yuebao in Alipay, you can automatically earn interest when you deposit ETH, and you can also spend cross-chain at any time.

SBTC: Like a "digital gold credit card", BTC can also earn income and can also be swiped everywhere.

2⃣ UnionPay-level network

LiquidityPad can open up the capital pools of all chains, so that new chains can quickly "attract investment" and old chains can "go to the countryside for poverty alleviation".

With the addition of the above products and experiences, for users, it is basically possible to manage the money of all chains in one account and earn income while lying down; It can also make Bitcoin an interest-bearing asset.

For the industry, on the one hand, it helps the new chain to accelerate the cold start, and attracts funds with real income; On the other hand, end the liquidity civil war and internal friction, so that money can flow freely in the whole chain, which chain is easy to use.

For the current currency circle, liquidity is the lifeblood of all products, and money is dead if it doesn't move. StakeStone's full-chain liquidity protocol essentially does nothing more than do three things:

Repair liquidity pipelines so that asset pools of all chains can be seamlessly linked; Build a liquidity pump, so that the money is automatically pumped to the chain with high returns (such as the new chain); Unify the standard and let the assets of different chains flow under one standard. Let the money flow smoothly between the blockchains. Ordinary users can earn income without brains, and the industry can completely bid farewell to fragmented internal friction, which is the real value of the full-chain liquidity narrative.

2. Analysis of the dual-token model: one work, one dividends

StakeStone recently published a whitepaper for its protocol and pioneered the use of two token models (sto and vesto).

This dual-token model is worth analyzing, as it epitomizes the project's intention to use this model to solve the current DeFi casino model and transform it into a partnership model, which may indicate the project's long-term strategic ambitions.

As shown in the figure above, the dual tokens, STO and veSTO, have a conversion mechanism, but their functions are different:

1⃣STO: Token for work

The main function is: governance voting, holding STO can vote to determine the direction of project development (such as which chain to support first). Rewards, the project uses STOs to reward users who provide liquidity (such as those who deposit ETH to earn interest). Fees are charged, and the platform takes a cut of each transaction and distributes it to the holders with STO.

In addition, it is particularly worth mentioning that although STO is a working governance token, it has its own deflationary mechanism, and other projects must buy STO and burn it if they want to use the liquidity of StakeStone.

2⃣veSTO: Dividend token

The token is mainly exchanged for veSTO by locking STO (similar to a deposit period). With veSTO, you automatically have three privileges, more voting power, and you can decide which pool the STO reward will be sent to; More holding income, when saving money to earn interest, veSTO holders' income doubles; There are more opportunities to receive red envelopes, and other projects will send "bribes" to veSTO holders (such as directly dividing ETH) in order to attract funds.

In addition, in order to prevent running away immediately after holding, veSTO is set to 30 days to unlock to prevent large investors from smashing the market.

This dual-token model does not seem to be complicated, but the entire design is basically aimed at the current industry pain points.

1⃣ In the past, users basically ran with one shot, and sold tokens after earning them, and the price of the currency fell endlessly; Now it is through veSTO lock-up, which indirectly prompts users to change from speculation to long-term floating, and the more they earn, they have to lock in and reduce speculation.

2⃣ In the past, the project team threw money crazy in order to start quickly, but no one used the pool; Now it's the veSTO holders who decide where the money goes, in other words, the community where the money flows has the final say.

3⃣ In the past, there was an unlimited issuance of project tokens, and some evil project parties were added at will; Now other projects want to use StakeStone's liquidity? Buy STO first and burn it! The more people use it, the more scarce STOs become.

From the above token design, the intent of the project can be clearly seen, and through the clever design of the token model, users and project parties can become a community of interests - the longer you participate, the more you earn, and you can still be the master.

3. Valuation and income potential: points, airdrops and ecological dividends

3.1 Project Valuation Analysis

From the perspective of track valuation benchmarking, the current top projects of liquid staking protocols such as EtherFi (FDV $820 million) and Puffer (FDV $250 million) generally fall in the range of $2-800 million, while StakeStone's valuation expectation (FDV $5-$1 billion) is generally higher than that of similar projects. This premium logic stems from three core supports:

1⃣ Scarcity premium for full-chain positioning

StakeStone is not a traditional single-chain staking protocol, but the first protocol to propose a full-chain liquidity infrastructure. Compared with Renzo and Puffer, which are vertically subdivided, their business logic covers three major scenarios: ETH staking, BTC interest-bearing assets, and cross-chain liquidity aggregation, which is equivalent to benchmarking LRT, BTC-Fi, and cross-chain bridges at the same time.

Horizontally comparing LayerZero (a full-chain interoperability protocol with a valuation of $3 billion), StakeStone focuses on the differentiated path of capital efficiency optimization, further strengthening its valuation imagination.

2⃣TVL-driven fundamental hard power

As of now, the total collateral assets (TVL) on the StakeStone chain have exceeded $700 million, and high liquidity means high market recognition, sufficient liquidity, and can often give higher valuations.

In particular, due to its dual-token model, it can bring a significant revenue multiplier effect: the protocol fee and bribery income are directly linked to TVL, forming a flywheel of "revenue growth-ecological expansion-TVL rise".

3⃣ The strategic depth of ecological linkage

Through the LiquidityPad product, StakeStone has reached in-depth cooperation with top ecosystems such as Plume (raising 10 million) and Story Protocol to provide them with initial on-chain liquidity.

This role of "liquidity infrastructure provider" brings triple gains: the fees and bribes paid by cooperative projects directly increase the agreement revenue; Each time a new chain is connected, StakeStone captures incremental users and assets for that chain.

To sum up, StakeStone's valuation logic should go beyond a single track benchmark, and its positioning as a full-chain liquidity hub, high TVL liquidity, and the snowball effect of ecological expansion together constitute a strong support for FDV of $5-1 billion.

3.2 Analysis of project participation benefits

The project has clarified the airdrop ratio, 3% of the total supply of the Wave1 reward pool in the first phase of the Carnival event, and 1.5% airdrop for the Berachain Vault event.

1)Wave1

Duration: March 26, 2024 - February 28, 2025 (about 340 days)

Staking status: 3 days ago: 342,000, 275,000, 259,000 ETH; After: ≈ 150,000 ETH

Points calculation: points in the first 3 days: about 2,102,400 points; The remaining 337 days of credits are averaged approximately 150,000 × 24 = 3,600,000,3,600,000 × 337 = 1,213,200,000 per day

Stage 1 Total Points: 1,215,302,400

Value per point:

Minimum: $15,000,000 ÷ $1,215,302,400 ≈ $0.0123/credit

Maximum: $30,000,000 ÷ $1,215,302,400 ≈ $0.0247/credit

2)Berachain Vault

Event Period: December 26, 2024 - February 28, 2025 (about 65 days) The average staking amount in the whole stage: ≈ 150,000 ETH

Points calculation: Points per day: 150,000 × 24 = 3,600,000, Total points: 3,600,000 × 65 = 234,000,000

Value per point:

Minimum: $7.5 million ÷ $234,000,000 ≈ $0.032/credit

Maximum: $15,000,000 ÷ $234,000,000≈ $0.064/credit

The above calculation is about 0.0123-0.064 US dollars / points in different stages, excluding the points markup coefficient, you can refer to the comparison query according to the number of points you have, and other points also have referral points and some boosts, these small heads are not calculated for the time being.

Due to the average calculation and high uncertainty of the data, the price is for reference only, combined with the feedback of the official team, it may be considered to increase the share of wave1, which is subject to the announced results.

IV. Conclusion

StakeStone recently announced two major updates: the simultaneous launch of the snapshot and dual-token model, further cementing its position as a full-chain funding hub, and optimizing the tokenomics model to enhance sustainability.

In the DeFi 3.0 era, omni-chain liquidity is the core narrative, and StakeStone's layout is extremely forward-looking:

Free flow of funds: Break down ecological barriers for BTC, ETH and other public chain assets to achieve efficient cross-chain flow.

Revenue model upgrade: Through the veSTO mechanism, users are bound to the long-term income of the protocol to reduce short-term speculation.

Improving the overall efficiency of the industry: ending the "digging and selling" model, guiding liquidity from competition to synergy, and improving capital utilization.

For the industry, the project provides a viable path from liquidity friction to value creation. In the world of DeFi, where liquidity is king, StakeStone is building the core financial infrastructure of the crypto industry.

If it can be successfully implemented, this will not only be a victory for the agreement, but also an important step for the entire industry to mature.

Special note: The various calculations in the article are based on public information and reasonable assumptions, and are not intended as investment advice, please make your own decisions and participate as appropriate!

Show original
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX TR is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX TR is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.