Is use-case specific chain a moat or more fragmentation? @PlasmaFDN is such a single-purpose chain built for stablecoins, every design choice optimized for one thing: winning stablecoin settlement globally I watched the interesting interview with founder @pauliepunt, got some answers👇 Why stablecoins? It is crypto’s most proven use case They already move ~$250B and will pass $1T soon The trillion-dollar opportunity = taking real share of global payments & settlement POV: But can’t we just use general purpose chain like Ethereal, Solona, Base, Tron etc? When you only optimize for stables, you can make very different choices: – Tech architecture – Go-to-market – Liquidity & incentives That edge is impossible for a generalist chain to match Tech architecture .@PlasmaFDN's focus: • Permissionless and verifiably neutral (better than Tron) • Fast zero-fee for USDT transfers (better than Tron, Solona, Base etc) • EVM-compatible so existing dev tooling just works • Seamless on/off-...
7.86K
0
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX TR is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX TR is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.