Some opinions on ICM: 1. Liquidity bottlenecks are not only for meme projects, but also for value projects, depending on the entire market environment, not something that can be changed by a concept or a narrative 2. People from all over the world come in to web3 for financing, and people from all over the world come in to buy coins, which are two concepts, financing = paying money, taking money to do things, whether it succeeds or not is another matter 3. The value of the stage that provides ICM with a stage is far greater than the value of the project generated by the ICM concept 4. If there can be a lot of liquidity later, this can be used as a better hype narrative, but the focus is still on Article 3 5. Each chain has its own characteristics, this feature, you can say that it is officially dominated by this chain, and some are dominated by the players of this chain, in addition to the base chain is backed by Coinbase, the project coin is self-contained, playing other project coins, I think it is better to play Binance alpha directly 6. ICM-> to raise funds, Lao Tie; Binance Alpha-> is over and goes to Alpha to enjoy greater liquidity 7. To be honest, I personally think ICM is just a narrative, and it is a very risky narrative, this year's real change, the change in the production relations of the currency circle, only Binance Alpha, has revitalized countless projects that almost choked up, providing a large number of jobs