One lesson of DOGE is that a lot of federal govt spending is sent to old ppl (social security, Medicare) and affluent individuals/orgs (defense, health spending) but the spending with the highest “lives saved per dollar spent” tends to go to v poor people or to scientists working on ignored diseases So if you’re trying to slash govt spending without upsetting old/affluent interests you’re (a) going to fail to find meaningful cuts and (b) inevitably gutting some of the most life-giving programs. (And that’s bad.)
The coolest part of DOGE is that while they crippled medical research and cost-effective foreign aid programs, they also didn’t save any money.
Something I’ve seen a lot in the last few months on here is what I’d characterize as a “bias against claims of virtue.” Believing that an organization is good just because it claims to be good is bad, and I shouldn’t do it. If I do it, I hope people call me out for it. But PEPFAR is actually good. Bed nets and antiretroviral programs are good—even tho, sure, you *could* argue that at some margin they take the place of local govt programs and thus incur the risk of moral hazard. But what we have a lot of now is a reflexive judgment among conservatives who basically think any program that claims to be virtuous is probably full of shit on account of its virtue claim. And I don’t think that’s the most useful framework for seeing the world.
This is the classic red herring sleight of hand people use to vilify any attempts to cut government spending — assuming all “life-giving” programs are unassailable by virtue of the fact they *purport* to benefit people who are not wealthy. It is this very (oftentimes unconscious) assumption that many unscrupulous actors use to defraud the taxpayer, using sympathetic causes as a shield to make questioning their impropriety politically problematic. Until we can get over this notion that every organization that says they do “good” things is unquestionably good, this will remain a major pipeline for fraud and abuse.
375.74K
4.8K
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX TR is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX TR is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.