The trouble with all of these treasury companies is they’re structured finance, not vanilla equity. There’s a reason why people buy individual stocks but rarely bonds - sophisticated people can transfer your money into their pockets many ways, many of them subtle,
🚨 Unchained obtained the pitch deck for the rumored Solana treasury company to be helmed by Joe McCann 👀
It’s been really eye opening to dig into the Ethena ENA treasury company SPAC. It’s a perfect tool to transfer wealth in various directions in a zero- or negative-sum manner. But it looks like one of the better ones! It doesn’t appear to plan on leverage so unlikely to blow up
I wonder why own TLGY shares when they’ll only get <2% of the new ENA treasury company. NAV was mentioned at >$800m on the investor call earlier this week. Market cap of TLGY is currently $88m. ENA needs to ~5.5x by Q4 closing for TLGY holders to break even. Did I flub the math?
Miles offers some good, practical questions here as well. Most of these just seem like amateurish capital structures with “heads I win, tails you lose” waiting for shareholders.
Few questions nagging me about treasury management companies: (1) How do you comply with ongoing PubCo disclosure obligations? If you disclose ongoing efforts of the digital asset issuer, you're increasing securities laws risk for the digital asset. If you don't, you may be committing fraud. (2) How do you reconcile a commitment to digital asset holders to support the price of the asset with equity capital raises of the PubCo with the Gary Plastic case? (3) What do you do when the shares eventually trade below NAV? These problems are manageable for treasury management companies being set up by third parties for very mature projects like BTC, ETH, and SOL. I'm not sure these problems are solvable where management teams of less mature projects are spinning up and controlling these public vehicles themselves. Crypto lawyers should be doing a better job here.
Say what you will about Saylor, but at least his capital structure (so far) is designed thoughtfully. I think he’s irresponsible sometimes but he at least thinks about how to avoid forced selling. I’m not convinced many of the new companies think beyond next month or quarter
My great hope is that ETFs outcompete these things. If someone really wanted leveraged, undiversified exposure to a token, that seems cheaper, easier, and feeds fewer fees to people who shouldn’t get them.
6.18K
11
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX TR is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX TR. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX TR is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.