GM fam! Does @Humanityprot feel like the next @worldcoin? It kinda does and that’s exactly why I’m cautious. $H just pulled a clean 4x out the gate, hit $124M FDV, and now it’s catching attention for fixing digital identity with palm scans and zk proofs, and in the euphoric can’t fade the meta phase. Solid idea. Sound familiar? $WLD launched with the same bold pitch to verify the world, kill the bots, and build a new financial rail around real humans. It pumped 10x in months then spent its time round-tripping into a slow bleed. Zoom out on $WLD’s chart, that first vertical spike looks a lot like $H’s current breakout on lower timeframes. So why the déjà vu? Technically, both ride the same identity thesis: proof of personhood, Sybil resistance, UBI rails, anti-AI spam. But their flavors differ. 🔹 $WLD scans irises, stores nothing, but relies on a hardware Orb empire 🔹 $H scans palms, starts with mobile selfies, and moves to palm vein with zk shards 🔸 $WLD builds on Optimism & Ethereum, now launching World Chain 🔸 $H builds its own zkEVM L2 with Proof-of-Humanity as consensus ▫️ $WLD is about world-scale UBI, real-world deployments, and ambition ▫️ $H feels like a crypto native response. Same mission, cleaner UX, less eyeballs. → Worldcoin had the hype, the Orb, Altman, even pseudo-UBI energy. But it also had the same problem that $H now faces, which is building a narrative before there was demand. Identity infra is foundational but it’s not a token flywheel yet. There’s no recurring use case outside of airdrops, governance, or being early. You verify once. You get your tokens. Then what? #Humanity Protocol is more privacy-preserving, more open, more web3-native. No Orbs, just palm scans from your phone. That’s a clear UX win. And their Proof-of-Humanity consensus model is novel, tying real people to the chain’s security layer. But that same model needs millions of real humans to keep working. The network is sybil-resistant but still untested at scale. No one's fighting to pay gas in $H yet, dApps aren’t queuing to integrate. → The token is riding vibes, not usage. I’m not bearish on the tech. Both $H and $WLD are trying to solve a real problem, distinguishing real humans from AI noise. But I am bearish on timing. Identity is a slow game. ✨ Is $H the next $WLD? Maybe. In the best way and the worst. A huge vision, big unlocks, big expectations followed by the long, quiet work of building real usage. Problem is, $WLD proved what happens when price > usage. 10x → fade → 90% downtrend. It’s early. But don’t confuse a hype cycle for product-market fit.