Recently, the thunderstorm incident of ZKJ and KOGE has sounded the alarm bell for the market - liquidity mining and alpha strategies are not risk-free arbitrage, and choosing the wrong target may lead to a significant reduction in principal. The collapse of these projects was due to a variety of reasons, including the lack of real business support, liquidity pool design flaws, and malicious cash-out by the team, which eventually led to LP losses, contract liquidation, and spot prices to zero. This series of events has caused the market to re-examine the core of the alpha strategy: not all projects are suitable for brushing, and the choice of the target is more important than the strategy itself. ** ### Why is MYX a better choice in the current market environment? #### 1. Project fundamentals: real business support, non-pure concept hype Unlike the thunderstorm project, MYX does not rely on market sentiment or short-term narrative to drive, but has actual products to land and occupy a certain market share in the segment track. This means that its token has the ability to capture value over the long term, rather than relying solely on liquidity mining to maintain its price. #### 2. The depth of the liquidity pool matches the market capitalisation, and the ability to resist shocks is strong The common characteristics of many thunderstorm projects are that the pool is shallow and the market value is inflated, which can cause violent fluctuations and even be maliciously manipulated by slight capital inflow and outflow. The pool depth of MYX is relatively thick under the current market value, which makes the slippage loss lower when brushing, and reduces the risk of large investors smashing the market. #### 3. The measured wear is low, which is suitable for long-term strategy execution After multiple rounds of testing, MYX's **capital wear rate in the brushing process is significantly lower than that of similar projects**, which means that the strategy execution cost is lower and more sustainable in the long run. In contrast, many high-APR projects may seem to have attractive returns, but the actual amount of money may outweigh the gains due to pool instability or token depreciation. #### 4. Market environment comparison: MYX's differentiated advantages After the thunderstorm of similar projects such as ZKJ/KOGE, the market's trust in high-yield alpha strategies has declined, and investors are more inclined to choose low-risk, verifiable, and real business support. MYX is in line with this trend – it does not rely on short-term speculation, but provides a more stable strategy execution environment through product and liquidity design. ** ### Conclusion: The Future of Alpha Strategy - Return to Fundamentals and Choose Sustainable Targets The lessons of ZKJ/KOGE show that high returns come with high risks, especially on projects that lack real value. In the current market environment, investors should pay more attention to the core factors such as the project's business viability, liquidity health, and team background, rather than blindly chasing short-term APR. The advantages of MYX are: ✅ There is real business support, not pure capital disk ✅ The pool depth is matched to the market capitalisation, reducing the risk of price manipulation ✅ The measured wear and tear is low, and the cost of strategy execution is controllable ✅ The market panic period remained stable and the ability to resist risks was strong For investors who want to execute an alpha strategy for the long term, choosing a target such as MYX may be more sustainable than betting on high-volatility, high-risk "hot projects". ** The market will eventually return to rationality, and projects with real value capture capabilities can become a stable choice for alpha strategies. In the future, we will observe the robustness of MYX before making a decision. Dyor