Sui is currently facing a rare moment, not just about a particular event or loss, but about how we choose to protect users and trust on this chain. Many people are discussing whether Sui is decentralized or not, and it's recommended to read the excellent article by @thecryptoskanda, which includes an excerpt: "As long as decisions are not made by a single entity, but by multiple entities that are not subordinate to each other according to decision-making procedures, then it is decentralized. It describes a governance decision model, not some abstract 'blockchain spirit.'" The foundation of DeFi has never been high returns or flashy narratives, but "what you invest in is worth preserving." This governance proposal represents a decentralized coordination capability: when things go wrong, can the entire community, builders, and validators stand up together and responsibly fix it? This is not just about a sum of money, but about a relationship of trust. As a member of the @bucket_protocol team, we interact with real users every day, watching them hold faith in the Sui ecosystem, participate in agreements, and stake assets. They are not here for a quick profit; they are genuinely using it, genuinely all in. When these people face risks, our role is not to be bystanders, but to uphold the value that this chain should have. More thoughts can be referenced from some ideas of our founder @damiendotsui: Supporting this proposal is not because we believe in a particular team or individual, but because we believe: the long-term value of a chain comes from whether it can do the right thing at critical moments. We support all actions that can protect user assets, uphold trust, and make this ecosystem more mature. Builders are the drivers, but what truly keeps the chain alive are those who choose to stand up and protect the community. What we need to do is achieve both.