Pendle price

Spaghetti chart anchored to the dump shows $PENDLE is the strongest bounce. Surprisingly ETH DeFi is in there too but likely because it dumped harder so mean reversion in raw % to the upside is also bigger, and unsurprisingly, $HYPE

🚨 slvlUSD Weekly APY Update: 8.27% Level's latest distribution is here👇 How to earn: 1️⃣ Mint lvlUSD → 2️⃣ Stake for yield → Convert to slvlUSD + track rewards 3️⃣ Unstake anytime → Redeem after 7-day cooldown 🧬 Bonus XP Farming • @pendle_fi: 40x XP (lvlUSD) / 20x XP (slvlUSD) • @CurveFinance: 60x XP for LPs • @MorphoLabs: 40x XP using lvlUSD as collateral 📌 Protocol revenue is distributed to slvlUSD based on daily average market cap since the last distribution, annualized with compounding. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Not available for US persons

wcgUSD is making waves on @base with over $13M in TVL and boosted PENDLE incentives!🌊 Don’t fight the wind—ride it. Tap into the wcgUSD Pendle boosted pool and let Equilibria’s signature touch carry you straight to maximum yield. Deposit wcgUSD ➡️

Seeing that everyone is talking about Pendle's YT/PT dual wielding, I will also briefly talk about it. Conclusion: Pendle is indeed a powerful tool to increase TVL, YT/PT is a means used by the project party to incentivise the growth of TVL, and dual wielding is the incentive of the arbitrage project party, but it has little impact on the final result. In the past, traditional staking was tge income such as lock-up, but after the emergence of Pendle, the income was split into PT (stable) and YT (betting tge). Big money buys PT and drives down APY; The APY decreases, and gamblers buy YT to pull up the returns; The rise in APY attracted more people to buy PT, and the TVL rolled up like this. The essence is to turn the "divergence" into a tradable market, creating TVL from scratch. Because YT can boost TVL, project teams usually give YT more incentives. This brings us to the arbitrage space: 20 points for a single token hold, 40 points for a dual hold of PT+YT (Pendle takes 5%), but the risk is almost the same. In a rational market, a large amount of local currency will naturally flow to Pendle dual-holding, resulting in incentives being "levelled". In fact, this is not what the project team hopes the most, because the original intention is to encourage gambling on YT, pull apy, attract big money to buy pt, and make TVL bigger. But this arbitrage has a limited impact, and the worst result is that everyone is dual-holding and the points are rebalanced. PT mortgage + revolving loan is different from dual holding, this is a real capital inflow (such as buying local currency with USDT and then doing circulation), which does bring new TVL, and the project party should support it instead. Summary: PT/YT dual wielding is arbitrage, but it doesn't hurt Pendle's growth logic. As long as the market is divided on APY, Pendle's TVL magic continues.